NBA (National Basketball Association) · Tuesday, 27 October, MSK

Miami Heat — Dallas Mavericks

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 27 October

Miami Heat46%
Dallas Mavericks54%
Model estimate at MSK

Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.

In short

Dallas Mavericks are slightly stronger: 54% against 46%.

The model expects a score around 117:118 — 235 points in total.

Over 234.5 points (incl. overtime) — 50%.

Why

  • Miami Heat play a third game in four nights — fatigue costs about 0.4 points.
  • Dallas Mavericks play a third game in four nights — fatigue costs about 0.6 points.

Probabilities

Expected points (incl. overtime): Miami Heat — Dallas Mavericks116.8–118.1
Total over 234.5 (incl. OT)50%
Total under 234.5 (incl. OT)50%

223 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, the regulation 1X2, who may miss the game, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • All handicaps
  • All totals
  • Miami Heat points
  • Dallas Mavericks points
  • Regulation 1X2
  • Who may miss the game
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Miami Heat

  • 15.04away · Charlotte Hornets126:127
  • 13.04Atlanta Hawks143:117
  • 11.04away · Washington Wizards140:117
  • 10.04away · Toronto Raptors114:128
  • 08.04away · Toronto Raptors95:121

Dallas Mavericks

  • 13.04Chicago Bulls149:128
  • 11.04away · San Antonio Spurs120:139
  • 09.04away · Phoenix Suns107:112
  • 08.04away · Los Angeles Clippers103:116
  • 06.04Los Angeles Lakers134:128

Head to head

  • 04.12.2025Dallas Mavericks — Miami Heat118:108
  • 25.11.2025Miami Heat — Dallas Mavericks106:102
  • 14.02.2025Dallas Mavericks — Miami Heat118:113
  • 25.11.2024Miami Heat — Dallas Mavericks123:118 OT
  • 11.04.2024Miami Heat — Dallas Mavericks92:111

Full record: 14 meetings →

NBA on the same day

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 54% will not happen in roughly 46 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →