Malmo — HV 71
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 31 October
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Malmo are favourites: 60% to win including overtime and shootout.
5.3 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (5.3).
Over 5.5 goals in regulation — 49%.
Why
- Malmo are more dangerous in attack: 2.9 expected goals against 2.4.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Malmo — HV 71 | 2.9–2.4 | |
| Malmo to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 60% | |
| HV 71 to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 40% | |
| Total over 5.5 (regulation) | 49% | |
| Total under 5.5 (regulation) | 51% |
111 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Totals incl. OT
- Handicap Malmo
- Malmo goals
- Overtime chance
- Full score grid
Form
- 10.10away · Farjestad2:6
- 08.10away · Lulea3:2
- 03.10Brynas1:0
- 01.10away · Skelleftea3:4 OT
- 26.09Frolunda1:2
- 10.10Brynas3:2
- 08.10away · Rogle3:4
- 03.10away · Farjestad1:3
- 01.10Orebro2:1 OT
- 29.09away · IF Bjorkloven2:4
Head to head
- 19.09.2026HV 71 — Malmo4:5 OT
- 07.02.2026Malmo — HV 713:2
- 30.12.2025HV 71 — Malmo2:3 OT
- 06.12.2025HV 71 — Malmo1:4
- 20.09.2025Malmo — HV 713:2
Table
SHL on the same day
- FrolundaLinkopingpreliminary72281The model's most likely outcome: 120%Model's score: 3:14.7
- SkellefteaIF Bjorklovenpreliminary73271The model's most likely outcome: 119%Model's score: 4:15.3
- VaxjoFarjestadpreliminary44562The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:35.1
- DjurgardenBrynaspreliminary41592The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:45.1
- OrebroRoglepreliminary44562The model's most likely outcome: 223%Model's score: 1:34.7
- TimraLuleapreliminary55451The model's most likely outcome: 123%Model's score: 3:14.7
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 48% will not happen in roughly 52 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →