Timra — Lulea
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 31 October
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Timra are favourites: 55% to win including overtime and shootout.
The model expects few goals: 4.7 in total, against a competition average of 5.3.
Over 5.5 goals in regulation — 38%.
Why
- Timra are more dangerous in attack: 2.5 expected goals against 2.2.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Timra — Lulea | 2.5–2.2 | |
| Timra to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 55% | |
| Lulea to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 45% | |
| Total over 5.5 (regulation) | 38% | |
| Total under 5.5 (regulation) | 62% |
111 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Totals incl. OT
- Handicap Timra
- Timra goals
- Overtime chance
- Full score grid
Form
- 10.10away · Lulea3:2 OT
- 08.10Frolunda4:1
- 03.10Skelleftea1:4
- 01.10away · Rogle1:4
- 29.09away · Brynas0:1
- 10.10Timra2:3 OT
- 08.10Malmo2:3
- 03.10away · Orebro4:1
- 01.10away · Linkoping2:0
- 29.09away · Skelleftea1:6
Head to head
- 10.10.2026Lulea — Timra2:3 OT
- 26.02.2026Lulea — Timra7:3
- 28.12.2025Lulea — Timra5:1
- 29.11.2025Timra — Lulea3:2
- 04.10.2025Timra — Lulea2:1
Table
SHL on the same day
- FrolundaLinkopingpreliminary72281The model's most likely outcome: 120%Model's score: 3:14.7
- SkellefteaIF Bjorklovenpreliminary73271The model's most likely outcome: 119%Model's score: 4:15.3
- VaxjoFarjestadpreliminary44562The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:35.1
- DjurgardenBrynaspreliminary41592The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:45.1
- MalmoHV 71preliminary60401The model's most likely outcome: 121%Model's score: 4:25.3
- OrebroRoglepreliminary44562The model's most likely outcome: 223%Model's score: 1:34.7
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 43% will not happen in roughly 57 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →