Starodubtseva Y. — Charaeva A.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
1:2Missed
In short
Final score 1:2: the model's most likely outcome, Starodubtseva Y. to win (58%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 58% fails in about 42 matches out of 100 on average.
Starodubtseva Y. are slightly stronger: 58% against 42%.
Over 23.5 games — 50%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Starodubtseva Y. 1559, Charaeva A. 1503.
Probabilities
| Games over 23.5 | 50% |
| Games under 23.5 | 50% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Starodubtseva Y. games
- Charaeva A. games
- Score in sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
No past matches in the data yet.
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Rybakina E.Charaeva A.3 October · WTA · Beijing9461The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.17.5
- McNally C.Starodubtseva Y.12 October · WTA · Wuhan60401The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.21.5
WTA on the same day
- 44562The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
- 44562The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 86141The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.18.5
- 76241The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
- 67331The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
- 35652The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
- 43572The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
- 26742The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 58% will not happen in roughly 42 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →