Tala'ea El Gaish — Pyramids FC
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 20 October
In short
Pyramids FC are clear favourites: 56% against 16% for the opponent, draw 27%.
2.1 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.1).
Over 2.5 goals — 36%, both teams to score — 40%.
Why
- By the strength ratings Pyramids FC are about 0.8 goals per match stronger.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Tala'ea El Gaish — Pyramids FC What is xG? | 0.7–1.4 | |
| Tala'ea El Gaish not to lose | 44% | |
| Pyramids FC not to lose | 84% | |
| No draw | 73% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 40% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 60% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 36% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 64% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap Tala'ea El Gaish
- Tala'ea El Gaish goals
- Pyramids FC goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Form
- 13.10away · National Bank0:3
- 14.09Smouha SC0:1
- 07.09away · Olympic El Qanah FC1:1
- 01.09ZED FC0:1
- 26.08away · Petrojet-Suez3:2
- 12.10Ceramica Cleopatra4:1
- 17.09away · Al Sharkeyah-ENPPI2:1
- 09.09El Gouna FC1:0
- 31.08away · Al Masry SC1:0
- 27.08Abo Qir Semad2:0
Head to head
- 27.09.2025Pyramids FC — Tala'ea El Gaish4:0
- 23.02.2025Pyramids FC — Tala'ea El Gaish2:1
- 11.08.2024Tala'ea El Gaish — Pyramids FC2:5
- 05.04.2024Pyramids FC — Tala'ea El Gaish0:0
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pyramids FC | 6 | 6 | +11 | 18 |
| 2 | Al Ahly SC | 6 | 5 | +8 | 16 |
| 13 | Smouha SC | 6 | 2 | -2 | 7 |
| 14 | Tala'ea El Gaish | 6 | 2 | -3 | 7 |
| 15 | Wadi Degla FC | 6 | 1 | -1 | 6 |
Egyptian Premier League on the same day
- 2030502The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:11.9
- 403227XThe model's most likely outcome: XModel's score: 1:12.1
- 343234XThe model's most likely outcome: XModel's score: 1:12.3
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 56% will not happen in roughly 44 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →