A-League Men (Australia), round 2 · Saturday, 24 October, MSK

Western Sydney Wanderers FC — Auckland FC

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 24 October

Western Sydney Wanderers FC30%
Draw27%
Auckland FC43%
Model estimate at MSK

Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.

In short

Auckland FC are slightly stronger: 43% against 30%, draw 27%.

2.9 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.8).

Over 2.5 goals — 55%, both teams to score — 60%.

Why

  • By the strength ratings Auckland FC are about 0.2 goals per match stronger.

Probabilities

Expected goals: Western Sydney Wanderers FC — Auckland FC What is xG?1.3–1.6
Western Sydney Wanderers FC not to lose57%
Auckland FC not to lose70%
No draw73%
Both teams to score: yes60%
Both teams to score: no40%
Total over 2.555%
Total under 2.545%

183 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • All totals
  • Handicap Western Sydney Wanderers FC
  • Western Sydney Wanderers FC goals
  • Auckland FC goals
  • Corners and cards
  • Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Western Sydney Wanderers FC

  • 25.04Melbourne Victory0:2
  • 18.04away · Wellington Phoenix1:2
  • 11.04Sydney FC0:2
  • 04.04away · Melbourne City FC0:3
  • 20.03Adelaide United2:4

Auckland FC

  • 23.05Sydney FC1:0
  • 15.05away · Adelaide United3:0
  • 09.05Adelaide United1:1
  • 02.05Melbourne City FC1:1
  • 26.04away · Sydney FC2:2

Head to head

  • 19.12.2025Western Sydney Wanderers FC — Auckland FC0:2
  • 25.10.2025Auckland FC — Western Sydney Wanderers FC1:0
  • 05.04.2025Auckland FC — Western Sydney Wanderers FC1:1
  • 26.01.2025Western Sydney Wanderers FC — Auckland FC0:1

Full record: 4 meetings →

A-League on the same day

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 43% will not happen in roughly 57 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →