Ruse G. — Tagger L.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:0: the model's most likely outcome, Ruse G. to win (50%), came true.
Evenly matched: Ruse G. 50%, Tagger L. 50%.
Over 23.5 games — 51%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Ruse G. 1617, Tagger L. 1616.
Probabilities
| Games over 23.5 | 51% |
| Games under 23.5 | 49% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Ruse G. games
- Tagger L. games
- Score in sets
Form
No past matches in the data yet.
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Noskova L.Ruse G.2 October · WTA · Beijing74261The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
- Tagger L.Bartunkova N.13 October · WTA · Wuhan28722The most likely outcome came true: 21:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.20.5
WTA on the same day
- 80201The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.20.5
- 58421The most likely outcome did not happen: 10:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
- 51491The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
- 39612The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
- 72281The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
- 67331The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
- 46542The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 33672The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 50% will not happen in roughly 50 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →