Olimpico — Ferro
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 20 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Olimpico are clear favourites: 61% against 39% for the opponent.
The model expects a score around 85:82 — 168 points in total.
Over 166.5 points (incl. overtime) — 51%.
Why
- Team strength against the league average: Olimpico −0.5, Ferro −0.2 points in regulation.
Facts
- League table: Olimpico — No. 10, 3–3; Ferro — No. 14, 2–4.
- Last 5 meetings: Olimpico 2 wins, Ferro 3.
Probabilities
| Expected points (incl. overtime): Olimpico — Ferro | 85.5–82.2 | |
| Total over 166.5 (incl. OT) | 51% | |
| Total under 166.5 (incl. OT) | 49% |
223 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the regulation 1X2, the teams’ offence and defence, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All handicaps
- All totals
- Olimpico points
- Ferro points
- Regulation 1X2
- Offence and defence strength
Form
- 03.11Penarol74:87
- 21.10away · San Martin106:86
- 19.10away · Regatas83:80
- 13.10Boca Juniors93:80
- 08.10Atenas87:91
- 29.10away · Gimnasia61:73
- 21.10Platense86:81
- 13.10away · Atenas86:91
- 10.10away · Instituto de Cordoba94:97
- 09.10away · Independiente de Oliva97:92
Head to head
- 07.03.2026Olimpico — Ferro69:72
- 13.12.2025Ferro — Olimpico87:83
- 30.04.2025Ferro — Olimpico81:69
- 10.12.2024Olimpico — Ferro92:67
- 02.03.2024Ferro — Olimpico93:94
Table
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Argentino | 3 | 3 | .500 | 3 |
| 10, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Olimpico | 3 | 3 | .500 | 3 |
| 11, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Boca Juniors | 3 | 3 | .500 | 3 |
| 13 | Racing de Chivilcoy | 3 | 5 | .375 | 4 |
| 14 | Ferro | 2 | 4 | .333 | 4 |
| 15 | Regatas | 1 | 3 | .250 | 4 |
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 61% will not happen in roughly 39 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →