Struff J-L. — Tirante T. A.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:0: the model's most likely outcome, Tirante T. A. to win (64%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 64% fails in about 36 matches out of 100 on average.
Tirante T. A. are clear favourites: 64% against 36% for the opponent.
Over 24.5 games — 51%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Struff J-L. 1599, Tirante T. A. 1696.
Probabilities
| Games over 24.5 | 51% |
| Games under 24.5 | 49% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Struff J-L. games
- Tirante T. A. games
- Score in sets
Form
No past matches in the data yet.
No past matches in the data yet.
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Medvedev D.Struff J-L.3 October · ATP · Beijing80201The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
- Tirante T. A.Medjedovic H.8 October · ATP · Shanghai61391The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
ATP on the same day
- 50502The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.25.5
- 40602The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
- 35652The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
- 90101The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.20.5
- 57431The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.25.5
- 65351The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.24.5
- 16842The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
- 12882The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 64% will not happen in roughly 36 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →