Accounts and Premium are not available in your country; every forecast is open. New forecasts every day — in our Telegram channel.

Tennis: WTA, Hong Kong, hard · Monday, 2 November, (UTC+3)

Golubic V. — Boulter K.

☆ Save match

Model prediction and result

0:2Came true
Golubic V.45%
Boulter K.55%
Model estimate at (UTC+3), the last one before kick-off

In short

Final score 0:2: the model's most likely outcome, Boulter K. to win (55%), came true.

Boulter K. are slightly stronger: 55% against 45%.

Over 21.5 games — 53%.

Why

  • Rating on hard: Golubic V. 1577, Boulter K. 1630.

Probabilities

Games over 21.553%
Games under 21.547%

100 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • Games handicap
  • Sets handicap
  • First set
  • Golubic V. games
  • Boulter K. games
  • Score in sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Golubic V.

  • 24.10Joint M.1:2
  • 21.10Boulter K.0:2
  • 19.10Hontama M.2:0
  • 10.10Kasatkina D.1:2
  • 04.10Noskova L.0:2

Boulter K.

  • 24.10Siniakova K.0:2
  • 23.10Ruzic A.2:1
  • 21.10Golubic V.2:0
  • 20.10Sakatsume H.2:0
  • 13.10Shnaider D.0:2

Head to head

  • 21.10.2026Boulter K. — Golubic V.2:0

Full record: 2 meetings →

Next match

  • Liu C.Boulter K.4 November · WTA · Hong Kong
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.21.5

WTA on the same day

  • 2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.19.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.20.5
  • 1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.18.5

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 55% will not happen in roughly 45 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →