Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Krasnodar (W)beta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 12 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Krasnodar (W) are clear favourites: 61% against 39% for the opponent.
The most likely score in sets is 1:3. The model expects about 184 points in the match. First set: Krasnodar (W) — 56%.
Over 183.5 points — 50%.
Why
- Elo rating by sets: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) 1399, Krasnodar (W) 1481; chance to win a single set: Krasnodar (W) 56%.
Facts
- Last 5 meetings: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) 3 wins, Krasnodar (W) 2.
Probabilities
| First set: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) | 44% |
| First set: Krasnodar (W) | 56% |
| Points over 183.5 | 50% |
| Points under 183.5 | 50% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Metar Chelyabinsk (W)
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 30.10Minchanka (W)3:1
- 25.10away · St. Petersburg (W)0:3
- 13.10Yenisey (W)2:3
- 09.10Saratov (W)1:3
- 04.10away · Dynamo Moscow (W)0:3
- 31.10away · Saratov (W)3:0
- 25.10away · Dynamo Moscow (W)2:3
- 09.10Dynamo Kazan (W)0:3
- 04.10away · Kaliningrad (W)1:3
- 04.03away · Kaliningrad (W)3:0
Head to head
- 11.01.2026Krasnodar (W) — Metar Chelyabinsk (W)3:2
- 25.10.2025Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Krasnodar (W)3:1
- 28.02.2025Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Krasnodar (W)3:2
- 03.12.2024Krasnodar (W) — Metar Chelyabinsk (W)3:1
- 09.03.2024Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Krasnodar (W)3:1
Russian Super League (W) on the same day
- Omsk (W)Kaliningrad (W)preliminary37632The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:3183.5
- Dynamo Moscow (W)Uralochka-NTMK (W)preliminary58421The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:1183.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 61% will not happen in roughly 39 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →