Russian Women's Volleyball Super League · Monday, 23 November, (UTC+3)
Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Tulitsa (W)beta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 23 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Tulitsa (W) are slightly stronger: 55% against 45%.
The most likely score in sets is 1:3. The model expects about 184 points in the match. The first set is close to even: 47% to 53%.
Over 184.5 points — 50%.
Why
- The set ratings are nearly level: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) 1399, Tulitsa (W) 1450.
Facts
- Last 5 meetings: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) 1 win, Tulitsa (W) 4.
Probabilities
| First set: Metar Chelyabinsk (W) | 47% |
| First set: Tulitsa (W) | 53% |
| Points over 184.5 | 50% |
| Points under 184.5 | 50% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Metar Chelyabinsk (W)
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 30.10Minchanka (W)3:1
- 25.10away · St. Petersburg (W)0:3
- 13.10Yenisey (W)2:3
- 09.10Saratov (W)1:3
- 04.10away · Dynamo Moscow (W)0:3
- 01.11away · Omsk (W)3:2
- 26.10Dynamo Kazan (W)0:3
- 16.10away · Kaliningrad (W)3:1
- 09.10Uralochka-NTMK (W)1:3
- 03.10St. Petersburg (W)1:3
Head to head
- 18.01.2026Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Tulitsa (W)1:3
- 28.10.2025Tulitsa (W) — Metar Chelyabinsk (W)3:1
- 13.12.2024Metar Chelyabinsk (W) — Tulitsa (W)1:3
- 17.09.2024Tulitsa (W) — Metar Chelyabinsk (W)3:0
- 09.04.2024Tulitsa (W) — Metar Chelyabinsk (W)1:3
Russian Super League (W) on the same day
- Minchanka (W)Leningradka (W)preliminary21792The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3177.5
- Dynamo Moscow (W)Dynamo Kazan (W)preliminary15852The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3173.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 55% will not happen in roughly 45 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →