Saratov (W) — Kaliningrad (W)beta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 22 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Saratov (W) are slightly stronger: 56% against 44%.
The most likely score in sets is 3:1. The model expects about 184 points in the match. The first set is close to even: 53% to 47%.
Over 184.5 points — 50%.
Why
- The set ratings are nearly level: Saratov (W) 1476, Kaliningrad (W) 1480.
Facts
- Kaliningrad (W): 3 defeats in a row.
- Last 5 meetings: Saratov (W) 1 win, Kaliningrad (W) 4.
Probabilities
| First set: Saratov (W) | 53% |
| First set: Kaliningrad (W) | 47% |
| Points over 184.5 | 50% |
| Points under 184.5 | 50% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Saratov (W)
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 31.10Krasnodar (W)0:3
- 24.10away · Odintsovo (W)0:3
- 18.10Minchanka (W)3:0
- 09.10away · Metar Chelyabinsk (W)3:1
- 03.10Yenisey (W)2:3
- 31.10St. Petersburg (W)0:3
- 23.10away · Uralochka-NTMK (W)2:3
- 16.10Tulitsa (W)1:3
- 11.10away · Leningradka (W)3:1
- 04.10Krasnodar (W)3:1
Head to head
- 10.02.2026Kaliningrad (W) — Saratov (W)3:1
- 19.11.2025Saratov (W) — Kaliningrad (W)3:0
- 07.02.2025Saratov (W) — Kaliningrad (W)2:3
- 10.11.2024Kaliningrad (W) — Saratov (W)3:0
- 02.04.2024Kaliningrad (W) — Saratov (W)3:2
Russian Super League (W) on the same day
- Yenisey (W)Uralochka-NTMK (W)preliminary19812The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3176.5
- Omsk (W)St. Petersburg (W)preliminary17832The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3175.5
- Odintsovo (W)Krasnodar (W)preliminary88121The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:0169.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 56% will not happen in roughly 44 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →