Racing de Chivilcoy — Regatas
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 9 November
In short
Evenly matched: Racing de Chivilcoy 53%, Regatas 47%.
The model expects a score around 78:77 — 155 points in total.
Over 154.5 points (incl. overtime) — 49%.
Why
- Team strength against the league average: Racing de Chivilcoy −2.7, Regatas +0.1 points in regulation.
Facts
- League table: Racing de Chivilcoy — No. 13, 3–5; Regatas — No. 15, 1–3.
- Racing de Chivilcoy: 4 defeats in a row; Regatas: 3 defeats in a row.
- Last 2 meetings: Racing de Chivilcoy 0 wins, Regatas 2.
- Days of rest before the match: Racing de Chivilcoy 5, Regatas 11.
Probabilities
| Expected points (incl. overtime): Racing de Chivilcoy — Regatas | 77.8–77.0 | |
| Total over 154.5 (incl. OT) | 49% | |
| Total under 154.5 (incl. OT) | 51% |
223 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the regulation 1X2, the teams’ offence and defence, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All handicaps
- All totals
- Racing de Chivilcoy points
- Regatas points
- Regulation 1X2
- Offence and defence strength
Form
- 04.11away · Instituto de Cordoba71:75
- 02.11away · Atenas94:95
- 26.10Quimsa54:68
- 24.10Boca Juniors72:80
- 16.10away · La Union74:68
- 29.10away · Boca Juniors83:95
- 27.10away · Lanus63:72
- 19.10Olimpico80:83
- 03.10Instituto de Cordoba73:63
- 19.05Ferro85:87
Head to head
- 18.04.2026Racing de Chivilcoy — Regatas76:93
- 10.01.2026Regatas — Racing de Chivilcoy94:57
Table
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Lanus | 3 | 5 | .375 | 4 |
| 13 | Racing de Chivilcoy | 3 | 5 | .375 | 4 |
| 14 | Ferro | 2 | 4 | .333 | 4 |
| 15 | Regatas | 1 | 3 | .250 | 4 |
| 16 | San Lorenzo | 1 | 3 | .250 | 4 |
Liga Nacional on the same day
- 64361The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: —161.5
- 80201The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: —149.2
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 53% will not happen in roughly 47 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →