Botola Pro (Morocco), round 4 · Saturday, 17 October, MSK
CODM Meknès — Union Touarga Sport
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 17 October
In short
Evenly matched: CODM Meknès 34%, Union Touarga Sport 34%, draw 32%.
2.2 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.2).
Over 2.5 goals — 37%, both teams to score — 47%.
Why
- By the strength ratings the teams are almost level.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: CODM Meknès — Union Touarga Sport What is xG? | 1.1–1.1 | |
| CODM Meknès not to lose | 66% | |
| Union Touarga Sport not to lose | 66% | |
| No draw | 68% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 47% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 53% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 37% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 63% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap CODM Meknès
- CODM Meknès goals
- Union Touarga Sport goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
- 11.10away · Wydad Casablanca0:0
- 03.10KACM0:1
- 26.09away · Difaâ El Jadida6:2
- 05.07away · Ittihad Tanger1:2
- 02.07FAR Rabat3:2
- 08.10RS Berkane0:0
- 02.10away · Widad Temara1:0
- 26.09FUS Rabat2:1
- 05.07away · Wydad Casablanca2:1
- 02.07Ittihad Tanger1:0
Head to head
- 17.06.2026Union Touarga Sport — CODM Meknès2:0
- 31.01.2026CODM Meknès — Union Touarga Sport1:1
- 14.02.2025CODM Meknès — Union Touarga Sport0:0
- 19.10.2024Union Touarga Sport — CODM Meknès0:0
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2, CAF Champions League | MAS Fès | 3 | 2 | +2 | 7 |
| 3, CAF Confederation Cup | Union Touarga Sport | 3 | 2 | +2 | 7 |
| 4 | KACM | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 |
| 5 | Raja Casablanca | 3 | 1 | +1 | 5 |
| 6 | CODM Meknès | 3 | 1 | +3 | 4 |
| 7 | Ittihad Tanger | 3 | 1 | +1 | 4 |
Botola Pro on the same day
- 4332251The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:02.1
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 34% will not happen in roughly 66 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →