SuperLega (Italian volleyball) · Sunday, 1 November, (UTC+3)

Cisterna — Piacenzabeta

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 1 November

Cisterna10%
Piacenza90%
Model estimate at (UTC+3)

Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.

In short

Piacenza are clear favourites: 90% against 10% for the opponent.

The most likely score in sets is 0:3. The model expects about 169 points in the match. First set: Piacenza — 77%.

Over 169.5 points — 50%.

Why

  • Elo rating by sets: Cisterna 1356, Piacenza 1634; chance to win a single set: Piacenza 77%.

Facts

  • Last 5 meetings: Cisterna 0 wins, Piacenza 5.

Probabilities

First set: Cisterna23%
First set: Piacenza77%
Points over 169.550%
Points under 169.550%

66 more model lines in Premium

The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.

  • Score in sets
  • Sets handicap Cisterna
  • Total sets
  • All points totals
  • Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Cisterna

  • 08.04Milano1:3
  • 04.04away · Milano0:3
  • 25.02away · Trentino0:3
  • 22.02Lube Civitanova2:3
  • 15.02Cuneo Volley3:0

Piacenza

  • 12.04away · Perugia0:3
  • 09.04Perugia1:3
  • 06.04away · Perugia1:3
  • 29.03away · Modena3:1
  • 22.03Modena2:3

Head to head

  • 01.02.2026Piacenza — Cisterna3:0
  • 07.12.2025Cisterna — Piacenza1:3
  • 26.12.2024Piacenza — Cisterna3:1
  • 13.10.2024Cisterna — Piacenza1:3
  • 03.04.2024Cisterna — Piacenza1:3

Full record: 7 meetings →

SuperLega on the same day

  • ModenaVeronapreliminary
    1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:1186.5
  • 2The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3147.5
  • MilanoPadovapreliminary
    1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:1182.5

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 90% will not happen in roughly 10 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →