Accounts and Premium are not available in your country; every forecast is open. New forecasts every day — in our Telegram channel.

Serie A1 (Italian women's volleyball) · Saturday, 7 November, (UTC+3)

Scandicci (W) — Vero Volley (W)beta

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 7 November

Scandicci (W)30%
Vero Volley (W)70%
Model estimate at (UTC+3)

In short

Vero Volley (W) are clear favourites: 70% against 30% for the opponent.

The most likely score in sets is 1:3. The model expects about 182 points in the match. First set: Vero Volley (W) — 61%.

Over 181.5 points — 50%.

Why

  • Elo rating by sets: Scandicci (W) 1717, Vero Volley (W) 1843; chance to win a single set: Vero Volley (W) 61%.

Facts

  • Scandicci (W): 4 wins in a row; Vero Volley (W): 5 wins in a row.
  • Last 5 meetings: Scandicci (W) 1 win, Vero Volley (W) 4.

Probabilities

First set: Scandicci (W)39%
First set: Vero Volley (W)61%
Points over 181.550%
Points under 181.550%

66 more model lines in Premium

The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.

  • Score in sets
  • Sets handicap Scandicci (W)
  • Total sets
  • All points totals
  • Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Scandicci (W)

  • 01.11away · Bergamo (W)3:0
  • 28.10Novara (W)3:2
  • 18.10Firenze (W)3:0
  • 14.10away · Macerata (W)3:1
  • 10.10away · Vallefoglia (W)2:3

Vero Volley (W)

  • 01.11Consolini (W)3:0
  • 24.10UYBA Busto Arsizio (W)3:0
  • 21.10away · Bergamo (W)3:0
  • 17.10Novara (W)3:0
  • 11.10away · Macerata (W)3:1

Head to head

  • 29.03.2026Vero Volley (W) — Scandicci (W)3:1
  • 25.03.2026Scandicci (W) — Vero Volley (W)3:1
  • 22.03.2026Vero Volley (W) — Scandicci (W)3:2
  • 14.03.2026Scandicci (W) — Vero Volley (W)0:3
  • 21.02.2026Vero Volley (W) — Scandicci (W)3:0

Full record: 15 meetings →

Serie A1 (W) on the same day

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 70% will not happen in roughly 30 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →