Zenit Kazan — Kemerovobeta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 22 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Zenit Kazan are clear favourites: 96% against 4% for the opponent.
The most likely score in sets is 3:0. The model expects about 156 points in the match. First set: Zenit Kazan — 84%.
Over 144.5 points — 47%.
Why
- Elo rating by sets: Zenit Kazan 1714, Kemerovo 1409; chance to win a single set: Zenit Kazan 84%.
Facts
- Last 5 meetings: Zenit Kazan 5 wins, Kemerovo 0.
Probabilities
| First set: Zenit Kazan | 84% |
| First set: Kemerovo | 16% |
| Points over 144.5 | 47% |
| Points under 144.5 | 53% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Zenit Kazan
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 04.11away · Krasnoyarsk3:0
- 31.10away · Novokuybyshevsk3:0
- 28.10away · Zenit St. Petersburg2:3
- 25.10away · Dinamo-Lo3:0
- 22.10away · Orenburg3:0
- 04.11Yaroslavl3:1
- 30.10Din. Moscow2:3
- 25.10Krasnoyarsk3:0
- 20.10away · Novokuybyshevsk2:3
- 16.10Dinamo-Lo2:3
Head to head
- 04.02.2026Kemerovo — Zenit Kazan0:3
- 10.12.2025Zenit Kazan — Kemerovo3:0
- 23.03.2025Kemerovo — Zenit Kazan0:3
- 19.03.2025Zenit Kazan — Kemerovo3:0
- 21.12.2024Zenit Kazan — Kemerovo3:0
Russian Super League on the same day
- NovosibirskYaroslavlpreliminary9641The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:0143.5
- NovokuybyshevskZenit St. Petersburgpreliminary19812The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3180.5
- Gorky N. NovgorodBelgorodpreliminary21792The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3181.5
- MGTU MoscowUfapreliminary19812The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3180.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 96% will not happen in roughly 4 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →