Banfield — Lanús
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 24 October
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Lanús are slightly stronger: 42% against 28%, draw 30%.
2.4 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.1).
Over 2.5 goals — 43%, both teams to score — 50%.
Why
- By the strength ratings Lanús are about 0.4 goals per match stronger.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Banfield — Lanús What is xG? | 1.1–1.3 | |
| Banfield not to lose | 58% | |
| Lanús not to lose | 72% | |
| No draw | 70% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 50% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 50% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 43% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 57% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap Banfield
- Banfield goals
- Lanús goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Form
- 11.10away · Tigre2:1
- 06.10Rosario Central1:1
- 19.09away · Gimnasia LP2:2
- 15.09Barracas Central1:1
- 10.09away · Deportivo Riestra1:1
- 12.10Vélez Sarsfield2:0
- 03.10away · Newell's Old Boys0:0
- 22.09Estudiantes2:1
- 15.09away · Deportivo Riestra3:0
- 06.09Defensa y Justicia1:0
Head to head
- 14.04.2026Lanús — Banfield1:0
- 04.11.2025Banfield — Lanús2:1
- 19.04.2025Lanús — Banfield1:1
- 01.12.2024Banfield — Lanús0:1
- 17.07.2023Lanús — Banfield2:2
Liga Profesional on the same day
- Gimnasia MendozaClub Atlético Platensepreliminary393229XThe model's most likely outcome: XModel's score: 1:12.2
- Gimnasia LPSarmientopreliminary5526191The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 2:02.6
- TigreAtlético Tucumánpreliminary5428191The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 2:02.0
- TalleresDefensa y Justiciapreliminary4229291The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:02.4
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 42% will not happen in roughly 58 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →