French Ligue 2, round 9 · Friday, 16 October, MSK
Laval — Clermont Foot
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 16 October
In short
Laval are slightly stronger: 42% against 28%, draw 29%.
2.6 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.6).
Over 2.5 goals — 50%, both teams to score — 56%.
Why
- By the strength ratings the teams are almost level.
Facts
- League table: Laval — No. 18, 5 pts; Clermont Foot — No. 17, 6 pts. A gap of 1 pt.
- Laval: winless in 5; Clermont Foot: winless in 5.
- Last 4 meetings: Laval 0 wins, Clermont Foot 2, 2 draws.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Laval — Clermont Foot What is xG? | 1.4–1.1 | |
| Laval not to lose | 72% | |
| Clermont Foot not to lose | 58% | |
| No draw | 71% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 56% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 44% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 50% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 50% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap Laval
- Laval goals
- Clermont Foot goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
- 10.10Red Star2:3
- 18.09away · Grenoble1:1
- 11.09Boulogne0:0
- 04.09away · Dunkerque1:1
- 28.08Sochaux0:0
Head to head
- 03.01.2026Clermont Foot — Laval4:1
- 29.08.2025Laval — Clermont Foot0:0
- 18.01.2025Clermont Foot — Laval1:1
- 29.10.2024Laval — Clermont Foot1:2
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16, Relegation play-off | Boulogne | 8 | 0 | -2 | 6 |
| 17, Relegation | Clermont Foot | 8 | 0 | -3 | 6 |
| 18, Relegation | Laval | 8 | 1 | -7 | 5 |
Ligue 2 on the same day
- 4629251The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 2:02.5
- 4032281The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:02.2
- 4826261The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:03.0
- 5225231The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:13.4
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 42% will not happen in roughly 58 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →