French Ligue 2, round 9 · Friday, 16 October, MSK

Guingamp — Pau

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 16 October

Guingamp48%
Draw26%
Pau26%
Model estimate at MSK

In short

Guingamp are clear favourites: 48% against 26% for the opponent, draw 26%.

The model expects plenty of goals: 3.2 in total, against a competition average of 2.6.

Over 2.5 goals — 62%, both teams to score — 64%.

Why

  • By the strength ratings Guingamp are about 0.3 goals per match stronger.

Probabilities

Expected goals: Guingamp — Pau What is xG?1.8–1.3
Guingamp not to lose74%
Pau not to lose52%
No draw74%
Both teams to score: yes64%
Both teams to score: no36%
Total over 2.562%
Total under 2.538%

183 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • All totals
  • Handicap Guingamp
  • Guingamp goals
  • Pau goals
  • Corners and cards
  • Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Guingamp

  • 09.10away · Nancy0:1
  • 19.09Red Star1:3
  • 12.09Annecy FC2:1
  • 05.09away · Reims2:2
  • 29.08Nantes3:3

Pau

  • 09.10Laval3:2
  • 18.09Dunkerque2:0
  • 11.09away · Montpellier0:1
  • 04.09Sochaux1:1
  • 28.08away · Rodez2:2

Head to head

  • 17.04.2026Pau — Guingamp2:1
  • 08.11.2025Guingamp — Pau2:2
  • 10.05.2025Pau — Guingamp1:3
  • 18.10.2024Guingamp — Pau0:1
  • 27.04.2024Pau — Guingamp1:2

Full record: 6 meetings →

Table

Table «Overall», season 2026/27
#TeamPWDLGoals+/−Pts
7Dijon833214–12+212
8Pau83239–8+111
9Sochaux82515–6-111
10Metz824212–11+110
11Guingamp822410–13-38
12Dunkerque822410–13-38

Season 2026/27

Full table

Ligue 2 on the same day

  • 1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 2:02.4
  • 1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:02.0
  • 1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:02.4
  • 1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 1:03.6

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 48% will not happen in roughly 52 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →