EFL Championship, round 6 · Tuesday, 20 October, MSK
Wolverhampton Wanderers — Portsmouth
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 20 October
In short
Wolverhampton Wanderers are clear favourites: 59% against 16% for the opponent, draw 24%.
2.7 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.6).
Over 2.5 goals — 52%, both teams to score — 52%.
Why
- By the strength ratings Wolverhampton Wanderers are about 0.3 goals per match stronger.
Facts
- League table: Wolverhampton Wanderers — No. 10, 14 pts; Portsmouth — No. 20, 8 pts. A gap of 6 pts.
- Days of rest before the match: Wolverhampton Wanderers 7, Portsmouth 9.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: Wolverhampton Wanderers — Portsmouth What is xG? | 1.8–0.9 | |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers not to lose | 84% | |
| Portsmouth not to lose | 41% | |
| No draw | 76% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 52% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 48% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 52% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 48% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Wolverhampton Wanderers goals
- Portsmouth goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
- 13.10Bolton Wanderers1:3
- 10.10away · Middlesbrough0:1
- 20.09West Bromwich Albion1:0
- 16.09away · Everton0:1
- 13.09away · Sheffield United1:0
- 11.10away · Southampton0:1
- 19.09Blackburn Rovers2:2
- 12.09away · Charlton Athletic0:0
- 05.09Cardiff City2:0
- 01.09Derby County0:2
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Queens Park Rangers | 9 | 3 | +3 | 14 |
| 10 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 9 | 4 | +2 | 14 |
| 11 | Millwall | 10 | 4 | 0 | 14 |
| 19 | Norwich City | 9 | 3 | -2 | 9 |
| 20 | Portsmouth | 8 | 2 | -2 | 8 |
| 21 | Burnley | 10 | 1 | -4 | 8 |
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 59% will not happen in roughly 41 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →