Prozorova T. — Garland J.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:1: the model's most likely outcome, Garland J. to win (58%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 58% fails in about 42 matches out of 100 on average.
Garland J. are slightly stronger: 58% against 42%.
Over 21.5 games — 52%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Prozorova T. 1535, Garland J. 1544.
Probabilities
| Games over 21.5 | 52% |
| Games under 21.5 | 48% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Prozorova T. games
- Garland J. games
- Score in sets
Form
- 24.10Gorgodze E.2:1
- 18.10Rakhimova K.1:2
- 17.10Sherif M.2:1
- 25.09Wang Xin.2:1
- 24.09Eala A.2:1
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Dart H.Prozorova T.26 October · WTA · Guangzhou46542The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
- Teichmann J.Garland J.3 November · WTA · Chennai59411The most likely outcome did not happen: 10:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.21.5
WTA on the same day
- 50502The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
- 49512The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 33672The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
- 44562The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
- 51491The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
- 55451The most likely outcome did not happen: 10:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.21.5
- 51491The most likely outcome did not happen: 10:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
- 63371The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 58% will not happen in roughly 42 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →