PremiumTelegram
EN
Sections

Tennis: results, 30 September 2026

Wednesday, 30 September · 24 matches · came true 12 of 24 (50%), expected 64%

All competitions
Calendar

September 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30

October 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31

Predictions are published three weeks ahead (beyond a week they are preliminary), tennis once the draw is known. The past four weeks show the results.

ATP · Beijingbeta

  • Khachanov K.Auger-Aliassime F.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
  • Struff J-L.Tirante T. A.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
  • Cerundolo J. M.Bu Y.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.25.5
  • Zhang Z.Gea A.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
  • Borges N.Djokovic N.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5

ATP · Tokyobeta

  • Vacherot V.Blockx A.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.25.5
  • Tabilo A.Paul T.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
  • Fils A.van Assche L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.20.5
  • Arnaldi M.Sakamoto R.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.24.5

WTA · Beijingbeta

  • Joint M.Kraus S.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.20.5
  • McNally C.Yastremska D.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Ruse G.Tagger L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Tjen J.Kalinina A.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Vidmanova D.Timofeeva M.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
  • Golubic V.Kalieva E.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
  • Snigur D.Kawa K.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • Sasnovich A.Gibson T.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Inglis M.Sonmez Z.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
  • Bai Z.Fruhvirtova L.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Oliynykova O.Yuan Y.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Preston T.Korpatsch T.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Hontama M.Boulter K.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
  • Jacquemot E.Frech M.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
  • Bondar A.Zarazua R.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5