Serie A1 (Italian women's volleyball) · Wednesday, 11 November, (UTC+3)
Macerata (W) — Talmassons (W)beta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 11 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Macerata (W) are slightly stronger: 57% against 43%.
The most likely score in sets is 3:1. The model expects about 184 points in the match. The first set is close to even: 54% to 46%.
Over 184.5 points — 49%.
Why
- The set ratings are nearly level: Macerata (W) 1432, Talmassons (W) 1430.
Facts
- Talmassons (W): 4 defeats in a row.
Probabilities
| First set: Macerata (W) | 54% |
| First set: Talmassons (W) | 46% |
| Points over 184.5 | 49% |
| Points under 184.5 | 51% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Macerata (W)
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 31.10Cuneo (W)3:1
- 25.10away · Brescia (W)3:1
- 18.10away · Consolini (W)0:3
- 14.10Scandicci (W)1:3
- 11.10Vero Volley (W)1:3
- 01.11away · Vallefoglia (W)0:3
- 24.10Chieri '76 (W)0:3
- 21.10away · UYBA Busto Arsizio (W)1:3
- 18.10Conegliano (W)0:3
- 11.10Cuneo (W)3:1
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Serie A1 (W) on the same day
- Consolini (W)Scandicci (W)preliminary11892The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3168.5
- Firenze (W)Chieri '76 (W)preliminary11892The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3168.5
- Novara (W)Conegliano (W)preliminary10902The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3167.5
- UYBA Busto Arsizio (W)Vallefoglia (W)preliminary41592The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:3183.5
- Vero Volley (W)Brescia (W)preliminary9911The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:0132.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 57% will not happen in roughly 43 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →