PremiumTelegram
EN
Sections

Tennis: results, 29 September 2026

Tuesday, 29 September · 22 matches · came true 15 of 22 (68%), expected 61%

All competitions
Calendar

September 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30

October 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31

Predictions are published three weeks ahead (beyond a week they are preliminary), tennis once the draw is known. The past four weeks show the results.

ATP · Beijing, qual.beta

  • Machac T.Gea A.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.24.5
  • Trungelliti M.Molcan A.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.24.5
  • Van De Zandschulp B.Cui J.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
  • Mannarino A.Carreno-Busta P.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.24.5

ATP · Chengdubeta

ATP · Hangzhoubeta

  • Medvedev D.Rublev A.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.24.5

ATP · Tokyo, qual.beta

  • Tsitsipas S.Hijikata R.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Munar J.Kovacevic A.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.24.5
  • Fils A.Majchrzak K.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • Vallejo D.Faria J.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:1. Model's score: 0:2.24.5

WTA · Beijing, qual.beta

  • Dart H.Ma Y.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Jacquemot E.Wolff V.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Kawa K.Savinykh V.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Wang J.Bai Z.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
  • Bassols M.You X.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Lazaro Garcia A.Fruhvirtova L.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Kalieva E.Shi H.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Sasnovich A.Lepchenko V.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
  • Montgomery R.Friedsam A-L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Inglis M.Astakhova D.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Burrage J.Hontama M.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Zaytseva K.Hunter S.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5