Accounts and Premium are not available in your country; every forecast is open. New forecasts every day — in our Telegram channel.
Liga de Expansion MX: power rankings
Season 2026/27 · updated 4 November 2026
The strongest side by the model is Atlético La Paz: +0.68 goals per game against an average opponent. Biggest climber of the week: Cancún FC (+1).
- Best attackAtlético La Paz1.72 goals per game
- Best defencePiratas0.83 conceded per game
- Climber of the weekCancún FC▲1 · now 4
- Faller of the weekAtlético Morelia▼1 · now 5
Ranking
Rating — goal difference per game against an average opponent at a neutral venue. ▲▼ — places gained or lost in a week.
| # | Team | Rating | Att. | Def. | Table | Form | Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atlético La Paz | +0.68 | 1.72 | 1.04 | 1 | WWDWL | 5 November · at Tlaxcala FC (8) |
| 2 | Leones Negros | +0.62 | 1.67 | 1.05 | 2 | WWLDW | 6 November · at Alacranes de Durango (7) |
| 3 | Piratas | +0.53 | 1.36 | 0.83 | 4 | DWWLW | 6 November · at Cancún FC (4) |
| 4▲1 | Cancún FC | +0.39 | 1.40 | 1.01 | 5 | WWDDW | 6 November · Piratas (3) |
| 5▼1 | Atlético Morelia | +0.36 | 1.34 | 0.98 | 3 | LWLDD | 5 November · at Venados FC (6) |
| 6 | Venados FC | +0.29 | 1.60 | 1.31 | 6 | DWDDW | 5 November · Atlético Morelia (5) |
| 7 | Alacranes de Durango | +0.24 | 1.08 | 0.83 | 7 | WLWDW | 6 November · Leones Negros (2) |
| 8 | Tlaxcala FC | +0.11 | 1.50 | 1.39 | 8 | WWDWD | 5 November · Atlético La Paz (1) |
| 9 | Mineros de Zacatecas | −0.03 | 1.35 | 1.38 | 10 | LLLDL | — |
| 10 | Correcaminos de la UAT | −0.15 | 1.12 | 1.26 | 12 | DLLLD | — |
| 11▲1 | Tapatío | −0.17 | 1.27 | 1.44 | 11 | DLLWL | — |
| 12▼1 | Cruz Azul Hidalgo | −0.26 | 0.95 | 1.22 | 15 | LLWWD | — |
| 13▲1 | Dorados | −0.34 | 1.25 | 1.59 | 13 | LLWLL | — |
| 14▼1 | Jaiba Brava del Tampico-Madero | −0.36 | 0.88 | 1.24 | 14 | LLWDL | — |
| 15 | Alebrijes Oaxaca | −0.43 | 0.83 | 1.26 | 9 | WWWWL | — |
| 16 | Tepatitlán FC | −1.41 | 0.69 | 2.10 | 16 | LLLLD | — |
How it is calculated
Only this season counts. The model rates every team’s attack and defence from this season’s matches — by expected goals (xG, the quality of chances) and actual goals, 60 to 40 — taking into account how strong the opponents were. The rating is the goal difference per game it expects against an average team of the league at a neutral venue. Every team starts with three games of league-average form, so a couple of lucky results early on do not make a leader.