EHC Kloten — Zug
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 1:3: the model's most likely outcome, Zug to win (54% incl. overtime), came true.
Zug are favourites: 54% to win including overtime and shootout.
The model expects few goals: 4.6 in total, against a competition average of 5.4.
Over 5.5 goals in regulation — 36%.
Why
- The teams are almost level on expected goals: 2.2 and 2.4.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: EHC Kloten — Zug | 2.2–2.4 | |
| EHC Kloten to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 46% | |
| Zug to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 54% | |
| Total over 5.5 (regulation) | 36% | |
| Total under 5.5 (regulation) | 64% |
111 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Totals incl. OT
- Handicap EHC Kloten
- EHC Kloten goals
- Overtime chance
- Full score grid
Form
- 09.10away · Davos4:1
- 03.10away · Langnau Tigers2:6
- 02.10Fribourg1:4
- 29.09away · Servette0:4
- 26.09away · Zurich2:3
- 04.10away · Servette1:2
- 29.09away · Rapperswil-Jona5:2
- 25.09away · Langnau Tigers3:5
- 22.09away · Lugano2:3 OT
- 19.09away · Davos6:2
Head to head
- 23.01.2026EHC Kloten — Zug1:2
- 03.01.2026Zug — EHC Kloten1:2 OT
- 17.12.2025Zug — EHC Kloten5:4
- 19.09.2025EHC Kloten — Zug2:5
- 27.02.2025EHC Kloten — Zug3:2
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Bern | 9 | 3 | +1 | 14 |
| 10, Play-in round for the quarter-finals | Zug | 7 | 4 | +10 | 13 |
| 11 | Davos | 11 | 4 | -4 | 13 |
| 13, Relegation play-off | Biel | 10 | 3 | -4 | 10 |
| 14, Relegation play-off | EHC Kloten | 11 | 2 | -17 | 9 |
Next matches
- EHC KlotenAmbri-Piotta16 October · National League54461The model's most likely outcome: 122%Model's score: 3:24.9
- AjoieZug17 October · National League38622The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:45.0
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 42% will not happen in roughly 58 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →