Tennis: ATP, Shanghai, qualifying, hard · Monday, 5 October, MSK

Sonego L. — Dougaz A.

☆ Save match

Model prediction and result

1:2Missed
Sonego L.78%
Dougaz A.22%
Model estimate at MSK, the last one before kick-off

In short

Final score 1:2: the model's most likely outcome, Sonego L. to win (78%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 78% fails in about 22 matches out of 100 on average.

Sonego L. are clear favourites: 78% against 22% for the opponent.

Over 21.5 games — 49%.

Why

  • Rating on hard: Sonego L. 1580, Dougaz A. 1431.

Probabilities

Games over 21.549%
Games under 21.551%

100 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • Games handicap
  • Sets handicap
  • First set
  • Sonego L. games
  • Dougaz A. games
  • Score in sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Sonego L.

  • 28.09Majchrzak K.0:2
  • 25.09Brooksby J.1:2
  • 24.09Duckworth J.2:0

Dougaz A.

No past matches in the data yet.

Head to head

No previous meetings in the data.

Next match

  • Dougaz A.Cina F.6 October · ATP · Shanghai
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5

ATP on the same day

  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.21.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
  • 1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:1. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 78% will not happen in roughly 22 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →