SuperLega (Italian volleyball) · Sunday, 25 October, (UTC+3)
Lube Civitanova — Padovabeta
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 25 October
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
Lube Civitanova are clear favourites: 94% against 6% for the opponent.
The most likely score in sets is 3:0. The model expects about 159 points in the match. First set: Lube Civitanova — 82%.
Over 146.5 points — 49%.
Why
- Elo rating by sets: Lube Civitanova 1680, Padova 1401; chance to win a single set: Lube Civitanova 82%.
Facts
- Last 5 meetings: Lube Civitanova 2 wins, Padova 3.
Probabilities
| First set: Lube Civitanova | 82% |
| First set: Padova | 18% |
| Points over 146.5 | 49% |
| Points under 146.5 | 51% |
66 more model lines in Premium
The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.
- Score in sets
- Sets handicap Lube Civitanova
- Total sets
- All points totals
- Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Form
- 06.05away · Perugia1:3
- 03.05Perugia1:3
- 30.04away · Perugia0:3
- 18.04Verona3:0
- 11.04away · Verona3:2
- 08.04Monza0:3
- 04.04away · Monza0:3
- 25.02Piacenza3:2
- 22.02away · Cuneo Volley3:2
- 14.02away · Monza0:3
Head to head
- 11.01.2026Lube Civitanova — Padova3:0
- 23.11.2025Padova — Lube Civitanova3:2
- 20.02.2025Padova — Lube Civitanova3:2
- 28.09.2024Lube Civitanova — Padova3:1
- 07.04.2024Padova — Lube Civitanova3:0
SuperLega on the same day
- TrentinoCisternapreliminary9281The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:0155.5
- MonzaVeronapreliminary29712The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:3185.5
- PiacenzaModenapreliminary47532The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:3188.5
- MilanoCuneo Volleypreliminary84161The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:0178.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 94% will not happen in roughly 6 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →