Accounts and Premium are not available in your country; every forecast is open. New forecasts every day — in our Telegram channel.

SuperLega (Italian volleyball) · Sunday, 8 November, (UTC+3)

Piacenza — Veronabeta

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 8 November

Piacenza72%
Verona28%
Model estimate at (UTC+3)

In short

Piacenza are clear favourites: 72% against 28% for the opponent.

The most likely score in sets is 3:1. The model expects about 185 points in the match. First set: Piacenza — 63%.

Over 184.5 points — 51%.

Why

  • Elo rating by sets: Piacenza 1668, Verona 1589; chance to win a single set: Piacenza 63%.

Facts

  • Piacenza: 3 wins in a row.
  • Last 5 meetings: Piacenza 3 wins, Verona 2.

Probabilities

First set: Piacenza63%
First set: Verona37%
Points over 184.551%
Points under 184.549%

66 more model lines in Premium

The chance of every score in sets, set handicaps and totals, every points total, the teams’ ratings and how the estimate moved before the match.

  • Score in sets
  • Sets handicap Piacenza
  • Total sets
  • All points totals
  • Teams’ Elo ratings by sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Piacenza

  • 01.11away · Cisterna3:1
  • 25.10Modena3:0
  • 18.10away · Padova3:0
  • 12.04away · Perugia0:3
  • 09.04Perugia1:3

Verona

  • 01.11away · Modena1:3
  • 25.10away · Monza3:1
  • 17.10Lube Civitanova0:3
  • 18.04away · Lube Civitanova0:3
  • 11.04Lube Civitanova2:3

Head to head

  • 20.12.2025Piacenza — Verona2:3
  • 20.10.2025Verona — Piacenza3:1
  • 22.03.2025Verona — Piacenza1:3
  • 16.03.2025Piacenza — Verona3:0
  • 09.03.2025Verona — Piacenza1:3

Full record: 10 meetings →

SuperLega on the same day

  • 2The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3177.5
  • 1The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: 3:1186.5
  • 2The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3181.5
  • 2The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:3180.5

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 72% will not happen in roughly 28 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →