EuroCup (basketball) · Thursday, 5 November, (UTC+3)

Tenerife — Cluj-Napoca

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 5 November

Tenerife54%
Cluj-Napoca46%
Model estimate at (UTC+3)

Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.

In short

Tenerife are slightly stronger: 54% against 46%.

The model expects a score around 89:88 — 177 points in total.

Over 176.5 points (incl. overtime) — 50%.

Why

  • Team strength against the league average: Tenerife −2.4, Cluj-Napoca −1.1 points in regulation.

Facts

  • League table: Tenerife — No. 9, 2–1; Cluj-Napoca — No. 7, 2–1.

Probabilities

Expected points (incl. overtime): Tenerife — Cluj-Napoca89.4–87.9
Total over 176.5 (incl. OT)50%
Total under 176.5 (incl. OT)50%

223 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, the regulation 1X2, the teams’ offence and defence, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • All handicaps
  • All totals
  • Tenerife points
  • Cluj-Napoca points
  • Regulation 1X2
  • Offence and defence strength
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Tenerife

  • 14.10Maxima Roma96:71
  • 11.10away · Murcia90:77
  • 06.10away · London Lions77:89
  • 03.10away · Unicaja80:75
  • 30.09Turk Telekom82:75

Cluj-Napoca

  • 14.10away · Siauliai93:75
  • 07.10Venezia98:92
  • 30.09away · Maxima Roma55:89
  • 17.03away · Bahcesehir Kol.72:75
  • 11.03away · Buducnost100:82

Head to head

No previous meetings in the data.

Table

Group B

Table «Group B», season 2026/27
#TeamPWLPCTGB
1, PlayoffsCluj-Napoca321.667—
2, PlayoffsVenezia321.667—
3, PlayoffsTenerife321.667—
4, PlayoffsFrankfurt321.667—
5Turk Telekom312.3331
6Siauliai312.3331
7London Lions312.3331
8Maxima Roma312.3331

Season 2026/27 · by win percentage, ties by head-to-head record, then the points difference in those games and overall

Full table

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 54% will not happen in roughly 46 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →