Tenerife — Maxima Roma
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 14 October
In short
Evenly matched: Tenerife 47%, Maxima Roma 53%.
The model expects a score around 82:83 — 165 points in total.
Over 164.5 points (incl. overtime) — 50%.
Why
- Team strength against the league average: Tenerife −5.0, Maxima Roma −1.4 points in regulation.
Probabilities
| Expected points (incl. overtime): Tenerife — Maxima Roma | 82.0–83.1 | |
| Total over 164.5 (incl. OT) | 50% | |
| Total under 164.5 (incl. OT) | 50% |
223 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the regulation 1X2, the teams’ offence and defence, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All handicaps
- All totals
- Tenerife points
- Maxima Roma points
- Regulation 1X2
- Offence and defence strength
Form
- 11.10away · Murcia90:77
- 06.10away · London Lions77:89
- 03.10away · Unicaja80:75
- 30.09Turk Telekom82:75
- 27.09Basket Zaragoza80:81
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Table
Group B
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, Playoffs | Venezia | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 2, Playoffs | Maxima Roma | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 3, Playoffs | London Lions | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 4, Playoffs | Turk Telekom | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 5 | Tenerife | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 6 | Siauliai | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 7 | Frankfurt | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
| 8 | Cluj-Napoca | 1 | 1 | .500 | — |
EuroCup on the same day
- 45552The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: —172.1
- 36642The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: —162.1
- 55451The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: —169.6
- 64361The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: —167.0
- 34662The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: —172.4
- 49512The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: —170.3
- 54461The model's most likely outcome: 1Model's score: —169.2
- 23772The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: —170.1
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 53% will not happen in roughly 47 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →