McNally C. — Yastremska D.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
0:2Missed
In short
Final score 0:2: the model's most likely outcome, McNally C. to win (58%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 58% fails in about 42 matches out of 100 on average.
McNally C. are slightly stronger: 58% against 42%.
Over 23.5 games — 50%.
Why
- Rating on hard: McNally C. 1627, Yastremska D. 1571.
Probabilities
| Games over 23.5 | 50% |
| Games under 23.5 | 50% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- McNally C. games
- Yastremska D. games
- Score in sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
No past matches in the data yet.
No past matches in the data yet.
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Yastremska D.Chwalinska M.2 October · WTA · Beijing45552The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- Yuan Y.McNally C.10 October · WTA · Wuhan40602The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
WTA on the same day
- 80201The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.20.5
- 50501The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
- 51491The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
- 39612The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.23.5
- 72281The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
- 67331The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
- 46542The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 33672The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 58% will not happen in roughly 42 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →