Mpetshi Perricard G. — Kovacevic A.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:0: the model's most likely outcome, Kovacevic A. to win (61%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 61% fails in about 39 matches out of 100 on average.
Kovacevic A. are clear favourites: 61% against 39% for the opponent.
Over 23.5 games — 49%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Mpetshi Perricard G. 1525, Kovacevic A. 1491.
Probabilities
| Games over 23.5 | 49% |
| Games under 23.5 | 51% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Mpetshi Perricard G. games
- Kovacevic A. games
- Score in sets
Form
- 24.10Duckworth J.2:0
- 20.10Tsitsipas S.1:2
- 07.10Berrettini M.1:2
- 29.09Munar J.0:2
- 28.09Svajda Z.2:1
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Mpetshi Perricard G.Fils A.27 October · ATP · Basel12882The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.20.5
- Shelton B.Kovacevic A.27 October · ATP · Basel84161The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.21.5
ATP on the same day
- 86141The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.19.5
- 43572The most likely outcome came true: 21:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 52481The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
- 43572The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 57431The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
- 43572The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:222.5
- 40602The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 41592The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 61% will not happen in roughly 39 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →