Medvedev D. — Basilashvili N.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:1: the model's most likely outcome, Medvedev D. to win (86%), came true.
Medvedev D. are clear favourites: 86% against 14% for the opponent.
Over 19.5 games — 53%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Medvedev D. 1835, Basilashvili N. 1552.
Facts
- Medvedev D.: 3 wins in a row; Basilashvili N.: 5 wins in a row.
Probabilities
| Games over 19.5 | 53% |
| Games under 19.5 | 47% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Medvedev D. games
- Basilashvili N. games
- Score in sets
Form
- 24.10Tsitsipas S.2:1
- 23.10Mannarino A.2:0
- 21.10Diaz Acosta F.2:0
- 19.10Cilic M.2:0
- 18.10Walton A.2:0
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Merida Aguilar D.Medvedev D.28 October · ATP · Vienna27732The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
- Rodionov J.Basilashvili N.28 October · ATP · Vienna41592The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.22.5
ATP on the same day
- 43572The most likely outcome came true: 21:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 52481The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
- 43572The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 57431The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
- 39612The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
- 43572The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 0:222.5
- 40602The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 41592The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 86% will not happen in roughly 14 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →