FC Anyang — Bucheon FC 1995
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 2:1: the model's most likely outcome, FC Anyang to win (55%), came true.
FC Anyang are clear favourites: 55% against 17% for the opponent, draw 28%.
2.6 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.5).
Over 2.5 goals — 50%, both teams to score — 54%.
Why
- By the strength ratings FC Anyang are about 0.2 goals per match stronger.
- FC Anyang are 188 points higher on Elo.
Facts
- FC Anyang: unbeaten in 5; Bucheon FC 1995: 4 defeats in a row.
- Last 3 meetings: FC Anyang 1 win, Bucheon FC 1995 1, 1 draw.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: FC Anyang — Bucheon FC 1995 What is xG? | 1.7–0.9 | |
| FC Anyang not to lose | 83% | |
| Bucheon FC 1995 not to lose | 45% | |
| No draw | 72% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 54% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 46% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 50% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 50% |
183 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap FC Anyang
- FC Anyang goals
- Bucheon FC 1995 goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Match events
- 27′Jong-Woo Kim · Bucheon FC 1995
- 33′Ye-Geon Sung · Bucheon FC 1995
- 39′Jeong-In Park · Bucheon FC 19950:1
- 55′Sung-Wook Hong · own goal · FC Anyang1:1
- 81′Breno Herculano · FC Anyang
- 89′Kyung-Won Kwon · FC Anyang2:1
Substitutions (8)
- 66′Geon-Joo Choi ↔ Hyun-Woo Chae · FC Anyang
- 66′Breno Herculano ↔ Woon Kim · FC Anyang
- 72′Galego ↔ Seung-Bin Kim · Bucheon FC 1995
- 72′Gustavo Nescau ↔ Jeong-In Park · Bucheon FC 1995
- 80′Sang-Jun Kim ↔ Jong-Woo Kim · Bucheon FC 1995
- 81′Jin-Yong Lee ↔ Ji-Hun Kang · FC Anyang
- 86′Jeong-Hyun Kim ↔ Branislav Knežević · FC Anyang
- 87′Jeong-Wan Yu ↔ Ivan Jukić · FC Anyang
Match statistics
- 58Possession, %42
- 14Shots7
- 7On target4
- 4Corners1
- 1Yellow cards2
- 0Red cards0
Lineups
FC Anyang
- GKJeong-Hoon Kim
- DFKyung-Won Kwon
- DFJi-Hun Kang81′
- DFDong-Jin Kim
- DFDanny Bakker
- DFJi-Hun Kim
- MFMatheus Oliveira Santos
- MFBranislav Knežević86′
- FWHyun-Woo Chae66′
- FWIvan Jukić87′
- FWWoon Kim66′
Came on (5)
- FWBreno Herculano24′
- FWGeon-Joo Choi24′
- MFJeong-Hyun Kim4′
- MFJin-Yong Lee9′
- MFJeong-Wan Yu3′
Bucheon FC 1995
- GKHyeon-Yeop Kim
- DFHo-Jin Jeong
- DFSung-Wook Hong
- DFDong-Gyu Baek
- MFThiaguinho Santos
- MFTae-Hyun An
- MFJong-Woo Kim80′
- MFYe-Geon Sung
- FWSeung-Bin Kim72′
- FWRodrigo Bassani da Cruz
- FWJeong-In Park72′
Came on (3)
- FWGalego18′
- FWGustavo Nescau18′
- MFSang-Jun Kim10′
Form
- 24.10Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors FC1:1
- 18.10away · Pohang Steelers0:0
- 10.10away · Gimcheon Sangmu1:0
- 19.09Ulsan HD FC2:1
- 13.09away · Gwangju FC1:1
- 24.10Gwangju FC0:3
- 17.10away · Ulsan HD FC1:2
- 09.10away · Gangwon FC0:2
- 19.09Gimcheon Sangmu0:2
- 12.09Jeju SK2:2
Head to head
- 29.08.2026Bucheon FC 1995 — FC Anyang1:1
- 22.07.2026Bucheon FC 1995 — FC Anyang2:3
- 02.05.2026FC Anyang — Bucheon FC 19950:1
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7, Relegation round | Jeju SK | 34 | 12 | +2 | 47 |
| 8, Relegation round | FC Anyang | 34 | 11 | -7 | 46 |
| 9, Relegation round | Pohang Steelers | 34 | 11 | -9 | 43 |
| 10, Relegation round | Gimcheon Sangmu | 34 | 5 | -8 | 35 |
| 11, Relegation round | Bucheon FC 1995 | 34 | 7 | -16 | 32 |
| 12, Relegation play-off | Gwangju FC | 34 | 3 | -39 | 22 |
Next matches
- Gimcheon SangmuFC Anyang7 November · K League 1353034XThe model's most likely outcome: XModel's score: 1:12.5
- Bucheon FC 1995Pohang Steelers8 November · K League 12732422The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:22.3
K League 1 on the same day
- 4330271The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.2.6
- 4230271The most likely outcome did not happen: 11:1Final score 1:1. Model's score: 1:0.2.4
- 5129201The most likely outcome did not happen: 10:1Final score 0:1. Model's score: 1:0.2.6
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 55% will not happen in roughly 45 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →