Swedish Allsvenskan, round 25 · Sunday, 25 October, MSK
GAIS — IFK Göteborg
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 25 October
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
GAIS are clear favourites: 50% against 25% for the opponent, draw 26%.
2.9 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (3.0).
Over 2.5 goals — 56%, both teams to score — 59%.
Why
- By the strength ratings GAIS are about 0.4 goals per match stronger.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: GAIS — IFK Göteborg What is xG? | 1.7–1.2 | |
| GAIS not to lose | 75% | |
| IFK Göteborg not to lose | 50% | |
| No draw | 74% | |
| Both teams to score: yes | 59% | |
| Both teams to score: no | 41% | |
| Total over 2.5 | 56% | |
| Total under 2.5 | 44% |
181 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Handicap GAIS
- GAIS goals
- IFK Göteborg goals
- Corners and cards
- Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month
Form
- 10.10Sirius0:1
- 20.09away · Mjällby3:0
- 14.09away · Djurgården0:2
- 05.09Häcken0:0
- 31.08Brommapojkarna4:0
- 09.10Västerås SK1:0
- 19.09away · Brommapojkarna1:0
- 12.09Halmstads BK2:1
- 07.09away · Mjällby4:1
- 30.08Örgryte1:0
Head to head
- 26.04.2026IFK Göteborg — GAIS2:2
- 11.08.2025GAIS — IFK Göteborg0:1
- 28.04.2025IFK Göteborg — GAIS1:1
- 30.09.2024IFK Göteborg — GAIS2:0
- 06.05.2024GAIS — IFK Göteborg2:1
Table
| # | Team | P | W | +/− | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Västerås SK | 23 | 10 | -2 | 35 |
| 8 | IFK Göteborg | 23 | 10 | -9 | 35 |
| 9 | AIK | 23 | 9 | -4 | 33 |
| 10 | GAIS | 23 | 8 | +7 | 30 |
| 11 | Brommapojkarna | 23 | 8 | -5 | 30 |
Allsvenskan on the same day
- MjällbyHammarbypreliminary1724592The model's most likely outcome: 2Model's score: 1:33.1
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 50% will not happen in roughly 50 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →