Accounts and Premium are not available in your country; every forecast is open. New forecasts every day — in our Telegram channel.

AFC Champions League Elite, round 5 · Monday, 23 November, (UTC+3)

Tractor — Al-Wasl

☆ Save match

Model prediction for 23 November

Tractor49%
Draw25%
Al-Wasl26%
Model estimate at (UTC+3)

Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.

In short

Tractor are clear favourites: 49% against 26% for the opponent, draw 25%.

2.9 goals expected in total — close to the competition average (2.9).

Over 2.5 goals — 55%, both teams to score — 57%.

Why

  • By the strength ratings the teams are almost level.
  • Tractor are 79 points higher on Elo.

Facts

  • Tractor: winless in 5.

Probabilities

Expected goals: Tractor — Al-Wasl What is xG?1.7–1.2
Tractor not to lose74%
Al-Wasl not to lose51%
No draw75%
Both teams to score: yes57%
Both teams to score: no43%
Total over 2.555%
Total under 2.545%

183 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, corners and cards, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • All totals
  • Handicap Tractor
  • Tractor goals
  • Al-Wasl goals
  • Corners and cards
  • Full score grid
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Team news

No news on injuries, suspensions or lineups yet. It usually comes 1–3 days before the match, the lineups about an hour before; this page updates every 15 minutes.

Form

Tractor

  • 02.11Neftchi Fargona2:2
  • 26.10away · Al-Ain1:2
  • 12.10Al-Shamal0:0
  • 14.09away · Shabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC0:1
  • 14.04Shabab Al-Ahli Dubai FC0:3

Al-Wasl

  • 02.11Al Quwa Al Jawiya4:3
  • 12.10Al Ahli1:3
  • 14.09away · Al Qadsiah1:2
  • 10.03away · Al-Sadd1:3
  • 03.03Al-Sadd1:1

Head to head

No previous meetings in the data.

AFC Champions League Elite on the same day

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 49% will not happen in roughly 51 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →