KooKoo — JYP
☆ Save matchModel prediction for 13 November
Preliminary forecast: the match is more than a week away. Closer to it the model takes in fresh form, injuries and line-ups, and the numbers may move.
In short
JYP are favourites: 54% to win including overtime and shootout.
The model expects plenty of goals: 5.9 in total, against a competition average of 5.2.
Over 5.5 goals in regulation — 58%.
Why
- The teams are almost level on expected goals: 2.8 and 3.0.
Facts
- League table: KooKoo — No. 17, 10 pts; JYP — No. 4, 35 pts. A gap of 25 pts.
- Last 5 meetings: KooKoo 2 wins, JYP 3.
Probabilities
| Expected goals: KooKoo — JYP | 2.8–3.0 | |
| KooKoo to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 46% | |
| JYP to win (incl. OT and shootout) | 54% | |
| Total over 5.5 (regulation) | 58% | |
| Total under 5.5 (regulation) | 42% |
111 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- All totals
- Totals incl. OT
- Handicap KooKoo
- KooKoo goals
- Overtime chance
- Full score grid
Form
- 31.10IFK Helsinki1:3
- 30.10away · Lukko1:3
- 28.10Assat5:3
- 24.10Jokerit3:6
- 21.10away · Kiekko-Espoo2:4
Head to head
- 16.09.2026KooKoo — JYP3:5
- 27.02.2026JYP — KooKoo2:3
- 09.01.2026KooKoo — JYP6:1
- 17.12.2025JYP — KooKoo4:2
- 01.11.2025KooKoo — JYP0:4
Table
Liiga on the same day
- HameenlinnaJukuritpreliminary50502The model's most likely outcome: 224%Model's score: 1:24.0
- KalPaKiekko-Espoopreliminary48522The model's most likely outcome: 222%Model's score: 2:34.9
- SaiPaIlvespreliminary52481The model's most likely outcome: 122%Model's score: 3:25.0
- TapparaIFK Helsinkipreliminary61391The model's most likely outcome: 122%Model's score: 4:25.0
- TPS TurkuJokeritpreliminary65351The model's most likely outcome: 122%Model's score: 3:14.7
- PelicansAssatpreliminary56441The model's most likely outcome: 124%Model's score: 2:14.1
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 43% will not happen in roughly 57 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →