Djokovic N. — Struff J-L.
☆ Save matchModel prediction and result
In short
Final score 1:2: the model's most likely outcome, Djokovic N. to win (85%), did not happen. That happens: an outcome at 85% fails in about 15 matches out of 100 on average.
Djokovic N. are clear favourites: 85% against 15% for the opponent.
Over 20.5 games — 51%.
Why
- Rating on hard: Djokovic N. 1979, Struff J-L. 1611.
Probabilities
| Games over 20.5 | 51% |
| Games under 20.5 | 49% |
100 more model lines in Premium
All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.
- Games handicap
- Sets handicap
- First set
- Djokovic N. games
- Struff J-L. games
- Score in sets
Form
- 28.10Humbert U.2:1
- 09.10Hurkacz H.0:2
- 06.10De Minaur A.1:0
- 05.10Medvedev D.1:0
- 04.10Zverev A.2:1
Head to head
No previous meetings in the data.
Next matches
- Struff J-L.Borges N.30 October · ATP · Basel41592The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
- Djokovic N.Vacherot V.3 November · ATP · Paris67331The most likely outcome came true: 12:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
ATP on the same day
- 31692The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
- 72281The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
- 21792The most likely outcome came true: 21:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
- 36642The most likely outcome came true: 21:2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 8922The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.19.5
- 35652The most likely outcome did not happen: 22:1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 0:2.22.5
- 21792The most likely outcome came true: 20:2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.21.5
- 64361The most likely outcome came true: 12:0Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 85% will not happen in roughly 15 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →