Tennis: ATP, Beijing, hard · Thursday, 1 October, MSK

Bublik A. — Mensik J.

☆ Save match

Model prediction and result

0:2Came true
Bublik A.44%
Mensik J.56%
Model estimate at MSK, the last one before kick-off

In short

Final score 0:2: the model's most likely outcome, Mensik J. to win (56%), came true.

Mensik J. are slightly stronger: 56% against 44%.

Over 25.5 games — 48%.

Why

  • Rating on hard: Bublik A. 1737, Mensik J. 1778.

Probabilities

Games over 25.548%
Games under 25.552%

100 more model lines in Premium

All totals and handicaps, team totals, the score grid, every factor and how the estimate moved before kick-off.

  • Games handicap
  • Sets handicap
  • First set
  • Bublik A. games
  • Mensik J. games
  • Score in sets
Get Premiumfrom $5.99 a month

Form

Bublik A.

No past matches in the data yet.

Mensik J.

No past matches in the data yet.

Head to head

No previous meetings in the data.

Next matches

  • Cerundolo F.Mensik J.3 October · ATP · Beijing
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
  • Bublik A.Machac T.9 October · ATP · Shanghai
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5

ATP on the same day

  • 1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.25.5
  • 2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.25.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • 1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
  • 1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • 2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.25.5

This is the model’s statistical estimate, not a recommendation. An outcome at 56% will not happen in roughly 44 matches out of 100. How to read probabilities →