Premium
EN
Sections

Tennis: results, 3 October 2026

Saturday, 3 October · 25 matches · came true 18 of 25 (72%), expected 72%

All competitions
Calendar

September 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30

October 2026

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31

Predictions are published three weeks ahead (beyond a week they are preliminary), tennis once the draw is known. The past four weeks show the results.

ATP · Beijingbeta

  • De Minaur A.Halys Q.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.22.5
  • Rublev A.Safiullin R.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.24.5
  • Medvedev D.Struff J-L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
  • Zverev A.Shang J.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.21.5
  • Cerundolo F.Mensik J.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.24.5

ATP · Tokyobeta

  • Shapovalov D.Tabilo A.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.25.5
  • Alcaraz C.Arnaldi M.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.19.5
  • Berrettini M.Vallejo D.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Humbert U.Lehecka J.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.24.5

WTA · Beijingbeta

  • Krueger A.Li A.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 0:2. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Volynets K.Mertens E.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.20.5
  • Vekic D.Zhu L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Gauff C.Osorio C.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.18.5
  • Sakkari M.Hunter S.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
  • Ostapenko J.Badosa P.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.23.5
  • Gao X.Swiatek I.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 0:2. Model's score: 0:2, exactly right.17.5
  • Siniakova K.Svitolina E.
    2The most likely outcome came true: 2Final score 1:2. Model's score: 0:2.21.5
  • Rakhimova K.Fernandez L.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Zheng Q.Kalinskaya A.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:1. Model's score: 2:0.23.5
  • Bencic B.Zakharova A.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.19.5
  • Jovic I.Dart H.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:1. Model's score: 2:0.19.5
  • Sun X.Bucsa C.
    2The most likely outcome did not happen: 2Final score 2:0. Model's score: 0:2.20.5
  • Bouzkova M.Birrell K.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.22.5
  • Kartal S.Wang Xin.
    1The most likely outcome came true: 1Final score 2:0. Model's score: 2:0, exactly right.23.5
  • Rybakina E.Charaeva A.
    1The most likely outcome did not happen: 1Final score 1:2. Model's score: 2:0.17.5